30 June

Sticky

Parkin v Norman; Valentine v Lilley

All England Law Reports/1982/Volume 2 /Parkin v Norman; Valentine v Lilley - [1982] 2 All ER 583 [1982] 2 All ER 583 Parkin v Norman; Valentine v Lilley QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION DONALDSON LJ AND MCCULLOUGH J 23 FEBRUARY, 10 MARCH 1982 Public order – Offensive conduct conducive to breaches of peace – Threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour – Insulting – Nature of insulting behaviour – Homosexual activity in public lavatory – Accused making homosexual advances to plain clothes police officer – Accused's behaviour not observed by anyone else – Whether accused using 'insulting behaviour … likely' to occasion breach of peace – Whether likelihood...

30 June

0 Comments

Sticky

Dolly Kendall And Others v Mohamed Khan Det Corporal No 7307

Posted by site_admin

in Offensive Behavior

West Indian Reports/Volume 26 /Dolly Kendall And Others v Mohamed Khan Det Corporal No 7307 -(1979) 26 WIR 433 (1979) 26 WIR 433 Dolly Kendall And Others v Mohamed Khan Det Corporal No 7307 HIGH COURT OF THE FULL COURT OF GUYANA CRANE CJ AND COLLINS J 21ST SEPTEMBER 1979 Summary conviction offence – Public insult and provocation – Guyana national anthem – Refusal of cinema goers to stand up when national anthem being played – Whether such refusal insult to police officer – Whether police officer insulted and provoked in a manner likely to result in commission of breach of peace – Summary Jurisdiction (Offences)...

30 June

0 Comments

Sticky

CRIMINAL LAW – Offensive behaviour: the police officer as Victim

Posted by site_admin

in Offensive Behavior

Law Society Gazette/1989/Issue 1, January/Articles/CRIMINAL LAW - Offensive behaviour: the police officer as Victim - (1989) LS Gaz, 5 Jan, 86 (14) LAW SOCIETY GAZETTE (1989) LS Gaz, 5 Jan, 86 (14) 5 January 1989 CRIMINAL LAW - Offensive behaviour: the police officer as Victim John Marston, solicitor, senior lecturer, school of law, Leicester Polytechnic COPYRIGHT (c) 1989 THE LAW SOCIETY John Marston In DPP v Orum [1988] 3 All ER 449, the Divisional Court confirmed the view of most commentators that s.5 of the Public Order Act 1986 can properly be applied to situations involving police officers but no members of the general public save for the...

30 June

0 Comments

Sticky

Court of Appeal: The Admissibility of Identification Evidence Made on the Basis of Recognition from Photographs Taken at a Crime Scene R v Doherty [2016] EWCA Crim 246

Posted by site_admin

in Identification

Journal of Criminal Law/2016, Volume 80/Issue 4, August/Case Notes/Court of Appeal: The Admissibility of Identification Evidence Made on the Basis of Recognition from Photographs Taken at a Crime Scene R v Doherty [2016] EWCA Crim 246 - JCL 80 (234) Journal of Criminal Law JCL 80 (234) 1 August 2016 Court of Appeal: The Admissibility of Identification Evidence Made on the Basis of Recognition from Photographs Taken at a Crime Scene R v Doherty [2016] EWCA Crim 246 Adam Jackson © The Author(s) Keywords: ID evidence, recognition, Turnbull guidelines, photographs, police officers The appellant (D) was charged with three domestic burglaries, each of which took place in early December...

30 June

0 Comments

Sticky

REGINA v. TURNBULL AND ANOTHER REGINA v. WHITBY REGINA v. ROBERTS

Posted by site_admin

in Identification

ICLR: King's/Queen's Bench Division/1977/REGINA v. TURNBULL AND ANOTHER REGINA v. WHITBY REGINA v. ROBERTS - [1977] Q.B. 224 [1977] Q.B. 224 [COURT OF APPEAL] REGINA v. TURNBULL AND ANOTHER REGINA v. WHITBY REGINA v. ROBERTS 1976 July 6, 7; 9 Lord Widgery C.J., Roskill and Lawton L.JJ., Cusack and May JJ. Crime - Summing up - Evidence of identity - Prosecution's case solely or substantially evidence of identification - Defence of mistaken identity - Quality of evidence - Guidelines to be followed in summing up - Whether case to be withdrawn from jury Whenever a case against a defendant depends wholly or substantially on the correctness of...

30 June

0 Comments

Sticky

R v Pemberton

Posted by site_admin

in Identification

R v Pemberton (1993) 99 Cr App Rep 228 Court: CA Judgment Date: 15/10/1993 Catchwords & Digest CRIMINAL LAW, EVIDENCE AND PROCEDURE - TRIAL - DIRECTION TO JURY - ALIBI EVIDENCE - WITNESS GIVING EVIDENCE OF BEING WITH ACCUSED AT TIME OF OFFENCE - WITNESS DISCLOSING IN CROSS-EXAMINATION THAT UNABLE TO RECOLLECT WHICH NIGHT WAS IN QUESTION - IDENTIFICATION EVIDENCE - WHETHER JUDGE OUGHT TO HAVE DIRECTED JURY ON ALIBI EVIDENCE The appellant was charged with robbery following an incident in which money was stolen from a mini-cab driver by a man who absconded. The mini-cab driver picked the appellant out of an identification parade. The...

30 June

0 Comments

Sticky

R v Dean Gibbons [2008] EWCA Crim 1574

Posted by site_admin

in Hostile Witnesses

Neutral Citation Number: [2008] EWCA Crim 1574 No. 2007/04793/C1 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL CRIMINAL DIVISION Royal Courts of Justice The Strand London WC2A 2LL Date: Thursday 10 July 2008 B e f o r e: LORD JUSTICE HOOPER MRS JUSTICE COX DBE and THE RECORDER OF NOTTINGHAM (Sitting as a Judge of the Court of Appeal, Criminal Division) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - R E G I N A - v - DEAN GIBBONS - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Computer Aided Transcription by Wordwave International Ltd (a Merrill...

22 June

0 Comments

Sticky

Francis Fraser, Robert Warren

Posted by site_admin

in Hostile Witnesses

*160 Francis Fraser, Robert Warren Court of Criminal Appeal 5 November 1956 (1956) 40 Cr. App. R. 160 Lord Chief Justice , Mr. Justice Hallett and Mr. Justice Ashworth November 5, 1956 Evidence—Hostile Witness—Evidence in Contradiction of Previous Statement Held by Prosecution—Duty of Prosecuting Counsel. Where a Crown witness gives evidence on oath in direct contradiction of a previous statement made by him which is *161 in the possession of the prosecution, it is the duty of counsel for the prosecution at once to show the statement to the judge and ask the judge's leave to cross-examine the witness as hostile. Applications for leave to appeal against conviction. The...

22 June

0 Comments

Sticky

R. v Takis Prefasdaniel Pryce

Posted by site_admin

in Hostile Witnesses

Status: Positive or Neutral Judicial Treatment *111 R. v Takis Prefasdaniel Pryce Court of Appeal 11 November 1986 (1988) 86 Cr. App. R. 111 (The Lord Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Taylorand Mr. Justice Rose): November 11, 1986 Evidence—Witness—Hostile Witness—Witness Giving Statement Inconsistent With Previous Oral Statement—Whether to be Treated as Hostile Where a prosecution witness gave evidence inconsistent with a previous oral statement, applications to treat him as a hostile witness, and subsequently to call evidence to prove his previous inconsistent statement, were rightly granted. The appellant Prefas and one Pryce were charged with arson. Amongst the evidence found at the scene of the fire were three containers which...

22 June

0 Comments

Sticky

R v Maw

Posted by site_admin

in Hostile Witnesses

Download Request: Current Document: 4 Time Of Request: Monday, February 02, 2015 12:16:56 Send To: Summer Eudoxie JUDICIARY OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO HALL OF JUSTICE KNOX STREET PORT OF SPAIN, TTO Terms: R v Maw Source: All Subscribed Cases Sources Project ID: None Official Transcripts (1990-1997) R v Maw COURT OF APPEAL (CRIMINAL DIVISION) HOBHOUSE LJ, GARLAND, CURTIS JJ [1994] Crim LR 841, (Transcript: John Larking) 29 APRIL 1994 29 April 1994 P Cross for the Appellant; A Hawks for the Crown HOBHOUSE LJ (reading the judgment of the court): In the Crown Court at Durham in November 1993 the appellant, Michael Maw, stood trial before His Honour Judge McDonald and a jury on an indictment containing two counts....

Author: site_admin