18 August

Sticky

Regina v Ibrahim

Case No: 201000292 C1 Neutral Citation Number: [2012] EWCA Crim 837 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CRIMINAL DIVISION) ON APPEAL FROM BIRMINGHAM CROWN COURT His Honour Judge Cavell T20067312 Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL Date: 27/04/2012 Before : LORD JUSTICE AIKENS MR JUSTICE FIELD and HIS HONOUR JUDGE NICHOLAS COOKE QC - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Between : Regina Respondent - and - Ibrahim Appellant - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -...

18 August

0 Comments

Sticky

R v Ahluwalia

Posted by site_admin

in Battered Wife Syndrome

CA Linotype- Hell Finance Ltd v Baker (Staughton LJ) have some security. Accordingly, I grant a stay of execution in respect of the a monetary claim for I can see no ground for granting a stay of execution in respect of the claim for delivery up of the equipment. It is not the property of the defendant, and he has no right or title to it. In that respect the application is refused. Application dismissed. b Dilys Tausz Barrister. R v Ahluwalia COURT OF APPEAL, CRIMINAL DIVISION LORD TAYLOR OF GOSFORTH CJ, SWINTON THOMAS AND JUDGE JJ 20, 21, 31 JULY 1992 Criminal law — Murder —...

18 August

2 Comments

Sticky

Bad Character Evidence

Posted by site_admin

in Bad Character

https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal/a_to_c/bad_character_evidence/ Bad Character Evidence Law ◦ Definitions ◦ Exclusions Bad Character of Defendants ◦ Admissibility ◦ Exclusion of Bad Character evidence ◦ Power of Court to discharge Bad Character of Non-Defendants Policy ◦ Prosecution Policy: Defendants ◦ Prosecution Policy: Non-Defendants Procedure ◦ Charging ◦ Case preparation ◦ Proving Convictions and other reprehensible conduct ▪ Convictions ▪ Cautions ▪Penalty Notices for Disorder (PND) ▪ CRIS Reports ▪ Acquittals ◦ Defendants: convictions and reprehensible conduct ◦ Non-Defendants: Convictions and reprehensible conduct ◦ Seven Gateways of Admissibility ▪ Agreement of the parties section 101(1)(a) ▪ Waiver by the defendant section 101(1)(b) ▪ Important explanatory evidence section 101(1)(c) ▪Relevant to an important matter in issue between the defendant and the prosecution section 101(1)(d) ▪ Propensity to commit...

18 August

0 Comments

Sticky

SEERATTAN v STATE

Posted by site_admin

in Bad Character

REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE COURT OF APPEAL CR APP N0. 32/2013 Between PAUL VINCENT SEERATTAN Appellant And THE STATE Respondent ************************* JUDGMENT PANEL: Yorke-Soo Hon J.A. Bereaux J.A. Moosai J.A APPEARANCES: Mr. Jagdeo Singh and Mr. Criston Williams instructed by Ms. Adaphia Trancoso for the Appellant. Ms. Joan Honore´-Paul for the Respondent. DATE DELIVERED: 24th July, 2017 Delivered by: Justice A. Yorke-Soo Hon, J.A. INTRODUCTION 1.On 8th November, 2013, the appellant was convicted before Mr. Justice Mark Mohammed and a jury in the First Criminal Court San Fernando, on two counts of murder and has appealed the convictions. CASE FOR THE PROSECUTION COUNT ONE On the 22nd...

18 August

0 Comments

Sticky

ALEXANDER v STATE

Posted by site_admin

in Bad Character

REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE COURT OF APPEAL Cr. App. No 16 of 2012 Between CURTIS HERBERT ALEXANDER (also called Shabba) – Appellant and THE STATE - Respondent PANEL: Weekes, J.A. Yorke – Soo Hon, J.A. Mohammed, J.A. APPEARANCES: Ms. K. Byer for the Appellant Mrs. A. Teelucksingh-Ramoutar and Mrs. T. Hudlin-Cooper for the Respondent DATE DELIVERED: 7th July 2015 JUDGMENT Delivered by: Mohammed J.A. INTRODUCTION (1) On October 8th 2012, the Appellant was convicted of the rape of the virtual complainant (“N”) and sentenced to a term of imprisonment of twenty years with hard labour, to start from that day. THE PROSECUTION CASE (2) The Prosecution’s case was that...

18 August

0 Comments

Sticky

RAMBERAN v STATE

Posted by site_admin

in Bad Character

REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE COURT OF APPEAL Cr. App. No. 14 of 2010 BETWEEN RAMPERSAD RAMBERAN Appellant And THE STATE Respondent PANEL: Ivor Archie, C.J. Paula-Mae Weekes J.A. Alice Yorke-Soo Hon, J.A. APPEARENCES: Ms. J. Honoré-Paul for the State. Mr. Jagdeo Singh for the Appellant. DATE DELIVERED: 9th May, 2013 Delivered by: A. Yorke-Soo Hon, J.A. JUDGMENT 1.On 1stNovember 2010, the appellantwas convicted for the offences of sexual intercourse with a female under the age of fourteen. He was sentenced to seventeen years imprisonment and has appealed both the conviction and sentence. The Prosecution Case The virtual complainant, S.S., lived in Mayo with her mother, her stepfather (the appellant),...

18 August

0 Comments

Sticky

Bad News for Good Character (R v Hunter)

Posted by site_admin

in Bad Character

20/04/2015 In R v Hunter & Ors [2015] EWCA Crim 631, a specially constituted 5-member Court of Appeal (Thomas CJ, Sir Brian Leveson P, Hallett LJ, Coulson & Globe JJ) considered the question of when a good character direction is required, and the effect on the safety of convictions where one is required but is not given. Judgment was handed down last week (16.4.15) and GCN's Matthew Stanbury has considered this judgment on his blog The Public Lawyer , which is reproduced below with permission: Bad News for Good Character [originally published at https://thepubliclawyer.com/2015/04/16/bad-news-for-good-character/ ] In R v Hunter & Ors[2015] EWCA Crim 631,...

15 August

0 Comments

Sticky

Duke v State

Posted by site_admin

in Bail

TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE H.C. Cr. No 70/07 THE STATE V SAMUEL DUKE Before the Hon. Mr Justice Rajiv Persad. Appearances: Mr. Quincy Marshall for the State. Mr. Joseph George for the Accused. RULING Introduction: The Applicant is before the court upon an indictment charged with one count of Incest and one count of Serious Indecency arising out of an allegation by the Virtual Complainant that her father the accused had sex with her on the 15th October 1999. The Prosecution has applied to the court to have tendered before the jury evidence of the Accused’s bad character in the form of other evidence from the Virtual Complainant...

15 August

0 Comments

Sticky

FERGUSON & GALBARANSINGH v AG

Posted by site_admin

in Bail

THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE COURT OF APPEAL CIVIL APPEAL 2010 – 270 CV 2010 - 004144 BETWEEN STEVE FERGUSON ISHWAR GALBARANSINGH Appellants/Applicants AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Respondent PANEL: I. Archie C.J Weekes J.A. Soo-Hon J.A APPEARANCES: Mr. F. Hosein S.C. and Mr. R. Dass for the First Appellant Mr. A. Mitchell Q.C. and Mr. R. Persad for the Second Appellant Mr. A. Sinanan S.C. and Mr. K. Ramkissoon for the Respondent Dated: 23 February 2011 JUDGMENT We have come to the conclusion that the Court of Appeal has no inherent jurisdiction to entertain an application for bail and, in the absence of any applicable statutory provision or...

15 August

0 Comments

Sticky

FERGUSON v STATE

Posted by site_admin

in Bail

REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE COURT OF APPEAL Crim. App. No. 007 of 2014 BETWEEN ROGER FERGUSON APPELLANT AND THE STATE RESPONDENT PANEL: Mendonca, J.A. Narine, J.A. Mohammed, J.A. APPEARANCES: Mr. D. Khan, Mrs. U. Nathai-Lutchman and Ms. S. Hinds for the Appellant Mr. G. Busby, Assistant D.P.P. and Mrs. A. Teelucksingh-Ramoutar, Assistant D.P.P. for the Respondent DATE OF DELIVERY: 16th December, 2016. MAJORITY JUDGMENT Delivered by M. Mohammed, J.A., Mendonca, J.A. concurring; Narine, J.A. dissenting on Ground 6. Introduction: On the 22ndMarch, 2012, the appellant, Roger Ferguson, was convicted of the offence of possession of a dangerous drug, namely, cannabis sativa for the purpose of...

Author: site_admin