Skip to content

mag4law@hotmail.com
Attorneys
Practice Areas
Contact Us

(868) 624-7257

Trinidad Office
(868) 639-1809

Tobago Office
Make an Appointment

Home
About Us
International Society of Primerus Law Firms
Media
Case Histories
Legal Research Resources
Contact Us

Martin A. George & Company > Media > Legal Articles > CCJ Declares Guyana’s Cross-Dressing Law Unconstitutional (Click Here)

CCJ Declares Guyana’s Cross-Dressing Law Unconstitutional (Click Here)

Posted by Admin 4 MAGCO on November 19, 2018 with 0 Comment

CCJ Declares Guyana’s Cross-Dressing Law Unconstitutional

Legal Articles
Media

Written by Admin 4 MAGCO

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Comment

Name *

Email *

Search

Search for:

Legal Articles

THE INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS ACT
THE GOCKINGS
THE PM BREAKS HER SILENCE ON SECTION 34
Sweet talk from Kamla? Chamber wants more details on Tobago plan
Crimestoppers International conference – Singapore
TTRNA issues pre-action protocol to health minister
Nurses send Health Minister pre-action protocol letter
George: Make Tobago VAT free
TOBAGO BUSINESS CHAMBER and its Chairman Martin George teamed up with the Indian High Commission
Nursing Council to get lawful quorum
George: Tobago’s slice will only pay wages and bills
The Queen v Barking Youth Court
R v B
Court of Appeal: Unfit to Plead and Diminished Responsibility
What’s in place for Tobago asks Martin George
Tobago chamber wants Budget to focus on sea plane service
George wants India help to develop Tobago. New High Commissioner welcomed at reception
Welcome to Indian High Commissioner
Judge: Settle nursing impasse
George: All not well in Judiciary
Mixed views over Kamla’s refusal to speak on ‘Marlene-gate’
CAMPBELL v. R
WELHAM v DPP
Milton (Audley) v R
Baksh v The Queen
R v FOXFORD
R v Keane
R v Mills; R v Poole
R v Ward
Murphy v The Queen
Haines v Roberts
Director of Public Prosecutions V. Watkins
Defences
Regina v Blackman
Robinson v The State
Daniel v The State
Brown v The State
DANIEL M’NAGHTEN’S CASE. May 26, June 19, 1843.
WONG KAM-MING v THE QUEEN
REGINA v. RICE AND OTHERS
R v Thomas Michael Treacy
Regina v Phillips
Regina v Perren
R v Musone
Regina v Lubemba; Regina v Pooley
R v Kalia
R v Jisl and others
R v Cordingley
R v Copsey and another
R v Thornton (No 2)
Ramjattan v The State
LONGSWORTH v THE QUEEN
Battered woman syndrome
COURT IN THE FULL COURT OF THE SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL KING CJ(1), LEGOE(2) AND BOLLEN(3)
R v Horncastle
R v Davis
Regina v Ibrahim
AL-KHAWAJA AND TAHERY v. THE UK
R v Ahluwalia
Bad Character Evidence
SEERATTAN v STATE
ALEXANDER v STATE
RAMBERAN v STATE
Bad News for Good Character (R v Hunter)
Duke v State
FERGUSON & GALBARANSINGH v AG
FERGUSON v STATE
Persad v Persad ( CA Civ 130/200)
Kalloo v. Kalloo
Gohil v. Gohil
Gissing v. Gissing
STEPHEN v. STEPHEN
DELANEY v. DELANEY
R v Baskerville
LAWES v. R
R. v. HASSOCK
WATCHE v. FORBES
Taylor v Chief Constable of Cheshire
REGINA v. DODSON ; REGINA v. WILLIAMS
R v Wood
R v Tolson
R v Roberts and Anor
R v Imran and Hussain
R v Cook
R v Constantinou
R v Blenkinsop
Court of Appeal: The Admissibility of Identification Evidence Made on the Basis of Recognition from Photographs Taken at a Crime Scene R v Doherty [2016] EWCA Crim 246
Photographs, Video Recordings and Films
Photograph and Video Evidence in Court
R v Cole
R v Chaaban
R v Butt
Malcolm v DPP
DPP v RADZIWILOWICZ
J and Another v C and Others (1969)
FULLER v. O’BRIEN TT 2015 HC 7
FULLER v. O’BRIEN TT 2013 HC 206
Dawson v Wearmouth
C.B. v. C.A.M TT 2005 HC 14
AB v BB and Ors
J v C welfare of child is paramount
Form 12 Application for name change with consent of father named on bc where reputed father died
In the matter of the status of Children Act No. 17 of 1981

Copyright Martin George & Company

error: Content is protected !!